|
Blog
|
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Sunday, 10 January 2010 22:12 |
|
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case on college bias:
"The Christian Science Monitor reported the Christian Legal Society at the Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco was stripped of its registered student organization status at the college because it refused to allow gay and lesbian students to become voting members or officers."
Libertarians are clear about our opposition to government regulation of private business:
"The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever."
But U.C. Hastings is not a private business. It is a taxpayer-funded state school, which means that it cannot engage in any discriminatory behavior against any taxpayer. By refusing to use taxpayer funds to support the discriminatory student group, the University made the correct decision, which the Supreme Court will hopefully uphold. |
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 10 January 2010 22:38 |
|
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Friday, 04 December 2009 00:00 |
|
Hillary Clinton is such a disappointment. From Towleroad, Uganda: 'Kill Gays' Bill 'Likely to Pass:
"Activists and political observers expect the private members' bill, which proscribes the death penalty for 'serial offenders' and is still in the committee stage, to pass with little opposition and some minor changes."
Clinton's response?
She refuses to discuss removing US taxpayer funded foreign aid to Uganda, as dozens of other countries are threatening to do if the bill passes. But she gave us some nice talking points on World AIDS Day. I guess she thinks she's still campaigning, where she can get away with lots of words and no action. |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 December 2009 00:28 |
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Wednesday, 02 December 2009 00:00 |
|
From James Oaksun at Liberty for Maine:
Today, Liberty For Maine released a proprietary study and report regarding marriage equality votes in California, Maine and Washington state.
Town-level vote totals in Maine, and county-level results in California and Washington, were merged with 21 demographic variables to assess whether there was a consistent explanation for the results in the three states. The study found, in all three states, higher levels of wealth and education were strong predictors of support for the equality position.
In addition, a predictive model was constructed to calculate the probability of marriage equality being passed in all states within the next 5-10 years. The model predicts that Hawaii, Colorado, New Jersey, Maryland and Alaska are the states most likely to pass marriage equality next. California ranked tenth, and New York fifteenth. Maine – where marriage equality lost at the polls last month – ranked twenty-fourth.
The study and analysis was conducted by James Oaksun, chair of Liberty For Maine and president of Virtual Galt Corporation. Oaksun stated that, “Marriage equality is getting strong support from educational and economic elites, across multiple states. The problem is getting the next tier of support. Until the issue gains more traction with middle class voters, marriage equality will face tough sledding in the political process.”
In the report, Oaksun also offers five reasons why marriage equality lost in Maine, and suggests a strategy for the marriage equality movement going forward.
The report is available in .pdf form. |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 December 2009 00:27 |
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Tuesday, 01 December 2009 13:33 |
|
The national executive committee of Outright Libertarians has voted unanimously in favor of endorsing Restore Equality 2010, the California ballot initiative drive to repeal Proposition 8, which made it illegal for same-sex couples to marry in California. |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 04 December 2009 00:28 |
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Tuesday, 10 November 2009 00:00 |
I can almost forgive some of the gay rights groups when they attack the Constitutionally-protected First Amendment freedom of association, in their quest to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). They're just asking for the same special status as several other minority groups in this country, which in their minds translates to "equality."
But the ACLU should know better. If we can't trust the ACLU to defend the First Amendment, who can we trust to do it?
Oh, yeah. That's right. We can only trust the REAL Libertarians to protect ALL of our freedoms, all of the time.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 16 November 2009 11:32 |
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Sunday, 08 November 2009 15:29 |
Our friends at Pink Pistols got some favorable coverage recently in the wake of the Hate Crime bill being signed into law.
"That law was designed to make gays and lesbians feel good. It won’t protect them. If they want protection, they’ll have to sign up with a group formed for precisely that purpose. I’m talking about my favorite gay rights group in the entire country, the Pink Pistols." |
|
Last Updated on Monday, 16 November 2009 11:31 |
|
Written by Rob Power
|
|
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 03:25 |
|
From our friends at Queerty:
"Hate crimes laws should not give LGBTs a sense of safety.
They do not prevent anti-gay attacks. You think harsher punishments and federal funding for investigations factor into the mind of an attacker? They don't. So don't go around thinking Obama signing the Matthew Shepard Act makes you safer walking down the street. And nobody should be sending that message. Especially the gays."
Okay, so hate crime laws don't make us any safer, but they do endanger Constitutional protections for accused criminals. And don't even get me started on the death penalty mandate in this doozy of a bill. We can't even rely on death penalty opponents like the ACLU to speak out against it! There's more than enough shame to spread around. And we thought nobody could ignore the Constitution's protections of individual liberty better than Bush had.
[Insert here the apocryphal Benjamin Franklin quote about trading liberty for safety resulting in neither.]
So this all really was just a smokescreen to deal with the fact that a bunch of LGBT people who voted and contributed campaign money to Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and their cronies, thinking they'd repeal DOMA, DADT, the gay adoption ban in DC, etc., have finally realized the Democrats have no intention of keeping their campaign promises. Fantastic. It's like 1993 all over again. How many times will our community fall for this trick from the Democrats? |
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 03:27 |
|
Written by Scott Williamson
|
|
Sunday, 25 October 2009 22:06 |
|
Both of these states are polling at about 50% and the election is a few weeks away. I just sent both Washington and Maine some money and ask that you do to. Even if it is just $5.00. Please join me in fighting for equality! Thanks!
http://mainefreedomtomarry.com/
http://www.upwardstech.net/approvereferendum71
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 08 November 2009 15:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 6 |
|